- 2 - taxes. In 1996, Congress amended the section to allow abatement more often, but made the amendment effective only for interest accruing on tax deficiencies or payments for tax years beginning after the date of enactment--July 30, 1996. Petitioner, Charles Durham, was under audit for his 1992-94 tax years when the amendment was enacted. He wants to take advantage of the amendment’s terms, and so challenges the constitutionality of its effective date. The case comes to us on cross-motions for summary judgment. Background Before the 1996 amendment, the Commissioner could abate interest under section 6404(e) only when interest had accrued because of an IRS employee’s error or delay in performing a “ministerial act.” Sec. 6404(e) (1994) (“old section 6404(e)”); see Woodral v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 19, 24-25 (1999). But “ministerial act” was narrowly defined as “a procedural or mechanical act that does not involve the exercise of judgment or discretion....” Proced. & Admin. Regs., sec. 301.6404-2T(b)(2), Temporary Proced. & Admin. Regs., 52 Fed. Reg. 30163 (Aug. 13, 1987).2 This definition captured only such bureaucratic snafus as delays in transferring a case between offices or in issuing an already agreed-upon notice of deficiency. Id. Examples (1) and (2). 2 The identical definition carried over to the final regulations in effect for tax years commencing after July 30, 1996. Proced. & Admin. Regs., sec. 301.6404-2(b)(2).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011