Herbert C. Haynes, Inc. - Page 26

                                       - 26 -                                         
               D.   Use of Both Cash and Accrual Methods                              
               Petitioner argues that it should be permitted to use the               
          cash method for the business activity of cutting trees on its               
          own land.  “Where a taxpayer has two or more separate and                   
          distinct trades or businesses, a different method of accounting             
          may be used for each trade or business, provided the method used            
          for each trade or business clearly reflects the income of that              
          particular trade or business.”  Sec. 1.446-1(d)(1), Income Tax              
          Regs.  “No trade or business will be considered separate and                
          distinct * * * unless a complete and separable set of books and             
          records is kept for such trade or business.”  Sec. 1.446-                   
          1(d)(2), Income Tax Regs.                                                   
               Petitioner does not maintain separate businesses or                    
          separate books and records for its various business activities.             
          Indeed, petitioner stipulated:  “Because of the scope of                    
          petitioner’s activities and the entrepreneurial nature of the               
          industry, it is impossible to describe a single business model.             
          Further, the extent of petitioner’s activities * * * will vary              
          from year [to year] and involve many unique transactions.”                  
               Petitioner engages in various business activities.  In                 
          Wilkinson-Beane, Inc. v. Commissioner, 420 F.2d at 355, the                 
          Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, the court to which an               
          appeal of this case would lie, held that the taxpayer had to use            
          the accrual method where its business involved providing funeral            






Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011