Herbert C. Haynes, Inc. - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          and filed its Federal income tax returns using the cash method.             
          For FYE 1995, petitioner had gross receipts of $82,693,253 and              
          cost of operations of $78,340,960.  For FYE 1996, petitioner had            
          gross receipts of $76,677,330 and cost of operations of                     
          $72,745,121.  For FYE 1997, petitioner had gross receipts of                
          $86,123,392 and cost of operations of $81,561,495.                          
                                     Discussion                                       
          I.   Evidentiary Issue                                                      
               Attached to petitioner’s opening brief are exhibits which              
          were not included in the stipulation of facts and exhibits                  
          submitted pursuant to Rule 122.  Petitioner’s requests for                  
          findings of fact and argument refer to these exhibits.                      
               The submission of a case without trial under Rule 122(a)               
          does not alter the requirements otherwise applicable to adducing            
          proof.  Rule 122(b).  Statements in briefs do not constitute                
          evidence.  Rule 143(b); Evans v. Commissioner, 48 T.C. 704, 709             
          (1967), affd. per curiam 413 F.2d 1047 (9th Cir. 1969); Chapman             
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-147; Berglund v. Commissioner,             
          T.C. Memo. 1995-536.  Accordingly, the additional exhibits                  
          attached to petitioner’s briefs are not part of the record and              
          will not be considered by the Court.                                        
          II. Burden of Proof                                                         
               Petitioner appears to argue that respondent bears the burden           
          of proof on the issue of whether petitioner must maintain                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011