Tibor Guenther Horwath and Christel Horwath - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
                         mined with regard to paragraphs (1) and                      
                         (2)(A) of section 1367(a) for the taxable                    
                         year), and                                                   
                              (B) the shareholder’s adjusted basis of                 
                         any indebtedness of the S corporation to the                 
                         shareholder (determined without regard to any                
                         adjustment under paragraph (2) of section                    
                         1367(b) for the taxable year).                               
               For each of the taxable years at issue, each petitioner had            
          a zero basis in the TGC stock that each owned.4  Respondent is              
          thus wrong in asserting on brief that the “net effect on peti-              
          tioners is the same whether the depreciation deduction is taken             
          on Schedule C or flowed through to them [from TGC, an S corpora-            
          tion].”                                                                     
               We turn now to petitioners’ position that for purposes of              
          determining any depreciation deductions allowable with respect to           
          the computer simulator “TG&C is an S-corporation, [and] the                 
          simulation equipment, which was a gift for [sic] the company,               
          represents a gift to its stockholders.”  As support for petition-           
          ers’ position, petitioners point to section 25.2511-1(c)(1) and             
          (g)(1), Gift Tax Regs.5  Petitioners’ reliance on those regula-             

               4Petitioners do not contend, and the record does not estab-            
          lish, that for each of the taxable years at issue they had any              
          basis in any indebtedness of TGC to them.                                   
               5Petitioners may have intended to rely on sec. 25.2511-                
          1(h)(1), Gift Tax Regs., and not sec. 25.2511-1(g)(1), Gift Tax             
          Regs., for their position that any gift of the computer simulator           
          that SDC made to TGC was a gift to petitioners as the stockhold-            
          ers of TGC.  Our response to any such reliance by petitioners on            
          sec. 25.2511-1(h)(1), Gift Tax Regs., is the same as our response           
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011