- 14 - mined with regard to paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) of section 1367(a) for the taxable year), and (B) the shareholder’s adjusted basis of any indebtedness of the S corporation to the shareholder (determined without regard to any adjustment under paragraph (2) of section 1367(b) for the taxable year). For each of the taxable years at issue, each petitioner had a zero basis in the TGC stock that each owned.4 Respondent is thus wrong in asserting on brief that the “net effect on peti- tioners is the same whether the depreciation deduction is taken on Schedule C or flowed through to them [from TGC, an S corpora- tion].” We turn now to petitioners’ position that for purposes of determining any depreciation deductions allowable with respect to the computer simulator “TG&C is an S-corporation, [and] the simulation equipment, which was a gift for [sic] the company, represents a gift to its stockholders.” As support for petition- ers’ position, petitioners point to section 25.2511-1(c)(1) and (g)(1), Gift Tax Regs.5 Petitioners’ reliance on those regula- 4Petitioners do not contend, and the record does not estab- lish, that for each of the taxable years at issue they had any basis in any indebtedness of TGC to them. 5Petitioners may have intended to rely on sec. 25.2511- 1(h)(1), Gift Tax Regs., and not sec. 25.2511-1(g)(1), Gift Tax Regs., for their position that any gift of the computer simulator that SDC made to TGC was a gift to petitioners as the stockhold- ers of TGC. Our response to any such reliance by petitioners on sec. 25.2511-1(h)(1), Gift Tax Regs., is the same as our response (continued...)Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011