Thomas and Julia Bo - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          petitioners’ file.  Watson called Washburn, and he found                    
          petitioners’ file on November 7, 2001.                                      
               Petitioner called Watson on November 7, 2001, to ask her to            
          give him a statement that respondent was trying to resolve his              
          case.                                                                       
               Washburn delivered the file to Watson on November 8, 2001.             
          On that day, Watson called respondent’s examination division and            
          asked for an expedited audit of petitioners’ returns when she               
          received them.  Watson did not work on petitioners’ case during             
          unspecified dates between November 9, 2001, and January 17, 2002,           
          because she was busy working on cases calendared for trial that             
          month and because she took annual leave that she would otherwise            
          have lost.  Watson received petitioners’ original and amended               
          returns from an employee of respondent on December 5, 2001.                 
               Watson resumed working on petitioners’ case on January 17,             
          2002.  On January 24, 2002, using some of the checks petitioner             
          had provided, Watson showed him that the amounts that petitioners           
          had reported on their original returns for telecommunications               
          expenses were correct.  Petitioner agreed that Watson was                   
          correct.                                                                    
               Watson told petitioner that petitioners must pay taxes they            
          owed to remove the lien.  On January 24, 2002, petitioner told              
          Watson that petitioners wanted to file an offer in compromise               
          because they did not have enough money to pay the tax and                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011