- 2 - Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal income tax for the taxable year 2001 of $4,498. The deficiency is attributable solely to the 10-percent additional tax under section 72(t) on an early distribution from a qualified retirement plan. After respondent’s concession,2 the issue for decision is whether petitioners are liable under section 72(t) for the 10- percent additional tax on an early distribution from petitioner Hossam Helmy El-Bibany’s (Mr. El-Bibany) retirement plan. We hold that they are to the extent provided herein. Background Some of the facts have been stipulated, and they are so found. We incorporate by reference the parties’ stipulation of facts, supplemental stipulation of facts, and accompanying exhibits. At the time that the petition was filed, petitioners resided in Menlo Park, California. Mr. El-Bibany obtained a Ph.D. from Stanford University in 1992 and joined the faculty at Penn State University in 1993, until his job ended in 1999. At that time, petitioners had two small children, and petitioner Salma Hassan Kandil (Mrs. Kandil) 2 Respondent concedes that petitioners are entitled to an exception from the early distribution penalty under sec. 72(t)(2)(E) of $846 for qualified higher education expenses for books and supplies.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011