- 4 - In 2001, Mr. El-Bibany withdrew $48,720 from his retirement fund.4 Respondent does not dispute that petitioners incurred the following expenses in 2001:5 Room and board for petitioners’ family collectively Apartment rent $33,875 Utilities 1,200 Food 7,200 Subtotal $42,275 Health insurance for petitioners’ family collectively (including health insurance premiums and health care expenses) $1,800 Transportation for Mrs. Kandil 1,981 Books and supplies for Mrs. Kandil 846 Total $46,902 Petitioners timely filed a Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 2001. On their return, petitioners disclosed the $48,720 distribution and reported $44,982 as the taxable amount. Petitioners did not report the 10-percent additional tax imposed by section 72(t) on line 55 “Tax on qualified plans, including IRAs, and other tax-favored accounts”, but attached Form 5329, Additional Taxes on Qualified Plans (Including IRAs) and Other Tax-Favored Accounts, to their return. On Form 5329, petitioners 4 There is no evidence in the record describing Mr. El- Bibany’s retirement fund. In respondent’s trial memorandum and on brief, respondent indicated that this fund was a “qualified retirement fund with TIAA-CREF”. But see Rule 143(b) regarding ex parte statements in briefs and the like. 5 Mrs. Kandil received a scholarship that covered her tuition expense.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011