Hossam Helmy El-Bibany and Selma Hassan Kandil - Page 7

                                        - 6 -                                         
          expenses for the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s spouse to the extent            
          such distributions do not exceed the taxpayer’s qualified higher            
          education expenses for the taxable year, sec. 72(t)(2)(E), (7).             
          A.   Health Insurance Premiums                                              
               A distribution qualifies under section 72(t)(2)(D) if it was           
          made from an individual retirement plan to an individual after              
          separation from employment:  (1) If such individual has received            
          unemployment compensation for 12 consecutive weeks under any                
          Federal or State unemployment compensation law by reason of such            
          separation, sec. 72(t)(2)(D)(i)(I); (2) if such distribution was            
          made during any taxable year during which such unemployment                 
          compensation is paid or the succeeding taxable year, sec.                   
          72(t)(2)(D)(i)(II); and (3) to the extent such distribution does            
          not exceed the amount paid during the taxable year for insurance,           
          sec. 72(t)(2)(D)(i)(III).  A self-employed individual shall be              
          treated as having satisfied the requirement of section                      
          72(t)(2)(D)(i)(I) if, under Federal or State law, the individual            
          would have received unemployment compensation but for the fact              
          that the individual was self-employed.  Sec. 72(t)(2)(D)(iii).              
               Respondent does not dispute that petitioners incurred health           
          insurance expenses of $1,800.  Respondent contends, however, that           
          the exception under section 72(t)(2)(D) does not apply because              
          Mr. El-Bibany does not satisfy the statutory requirements.  We              
          agree.                                                                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011