- 7 - The record is clear that Mr. El-Bibany did not receive any Federal or State unemployment compensation at any relevant time. See sec. 72(t)(2)(D)(i)(I). Mr. El-Bibany, however, testified that he worked in “some nonemployment activities” related to high-tech investments in 2000. Mr. El-Bibany’s testimony raises the question whether he was self-employed. See sec. 72(t)(2)(D)(iii). Assuming arguendo that he was self-employed, there was no evidence to suggest that Mr. El-Bibany continued to work in such “nonemployment activities” in 2001. Indeed, Mr. El- Bibany was employed for only 2 weeks during 2001 in the United Arab Emirates. Moreover, Mr. El-Bibany presented no evidence that he would have been eligible to receive any Federal or State unemployment compensation. By his own testimony, Mr. El-Bibany applied for unemployment compensation, but he was not eligible because he had not worked for a specified period in California. In view of the foregoing, we conclude that petitioner does not satisfy the requirements under section 72(t)(2)(D). Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination on this issue. B. Qualified Higher Education Expenses Qualified higher education expenses for purposes of section 72(t)(2)(E) are defined by section 529(e)(3).8 Sec. 72(t)(7)(A). Section 529(e)(3)(A) defines qualified higher education expenses 8 Sec. 529 sets forth criteria for higher education entities to be exempt from taxation as a qualified tuition program.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011