Michael P. and Pamela J. Hopkins - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          Hopkins’s S Corporation’s claimed 1999 ordinary loss of $36,066).           
               Petitioners jointly filed Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income            
          Tax Return (1999 joint return), for their taxable year 1999.                
          Petitioners’ 1999 joint return reported, inter alia, the $88,254            
          capital gains distribution and the $204,002 profit-sharing plan             
          distribution.  Petitioners’ 1999 joint return included two                  
          Schedules C, Profit or Loss From Business (Schedule C).  One such           
          schedule (Mr. Hopkins’s sole proprietorship’s Schedule C) related           
          to Mr. Hopkins’s sole proprietorship known as MPH Enterprises.              
          That Schedule C reported $128,610 of gross receipts, claimed Mr.            
          Hopkins’s unidentified expenditures of $10,179 as an advertising            
          expense deduction, and showed a net profit of $44,219.                      
               In Schedule E, Supplemental Income and Loss (Schedule E),              
          included as part of petitioners’ 1999 joint return (petitioners’            
          Schedule E),5 petitioners claimed, inter alia, a nonpassive loss            
          of $103,150 from Mr. Hopkins’s S Corporation and a total loss of            
          $83,872.6  The nonpassive loss of $103,150 from Mr. Hopkins’s S             
          Corporation claimed in petitioners’ Schedule E was equal to the             
          sum of (1) Mr. Hopkins’s S Corporation’s claimed 1999 ordinary              


               5Petitioners’ Schedule E was incomplete in that it consisted           
          of only one page.                                                           
               6Petitioners determined the total loss claimed in petition-            
          ers’ Schedule E by reducing (1) the total of the respective                 
          nonpassive losses that they claimed in that schedule from Mr.               
          Hopkins’s S Corporation and another S corporation by (2) the                
          nonpassive income that they reported in that schedule from a                
          limited partnership.                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011