- 10 - Hopkins’s unidentified expenditures of $10,179 that petitioners claimed as advertising expenses in Mr. Hopkins’s sole proprietor- ship’s Schedule C.12 Based upon respondent’s examination of Mr. Hopkins’s S Corporation’s 1999 Form 1120S, respondent also disallowed in the notice the nonpassive loss of $103,150 from Mr. Hopkins’s S Corporation that petitioners claimed in petitioners’ Schedule E.13 Respondent further determined in the notice that petitioners are liable for 1999 for the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a). OPINION The parties do not address section 7491(a). Since the year at issue is 1999, we presume that section 7491(a) is applicable in the instant case. On the record before us, we find that petitioners have failed to carry their burden of establishing that they satisfy the applicable requirements of section 11(...continued) $5,144) is equal to approximately 4 percent of the $128,610 of gross receipts reported in Mr. Hopkins’s sole proprietorship’s Schedule C. 12Petitioners concede, inter alia, respondent’s determina- tion to disallow in the notice certain deductions claimed in Mr. Hopkins’s sole proprietorship’s Schedule C, including the disal- lowance of $5,035 of Mr. Hopkins’s unidentified expenditures of $10,179. 13As discussed above, the nonpassive loss of $103,150 from Mr. Hopkins’s S Corporation claimed in petitioners’ Schedule E was equal to the sum of (1) Mr. Hopkins’s S Corporation’s claimed 1999 ordinary loss of $36,066 and (2) Mr. Hopkins’s automobile racing expenditures of $67,084 claimed in Statement SBE included as part of petitioners’ 1999 joint return.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011