- 6 -
policy and overall scope to guide the incumbent.
Completed work is considered technically authoritative
and is normally accepted without significant change.
Petitioner was responsible for the quality and technical
accuracy of all services and work product delivered under the
personal service contracts. The Government had the right to
inspect and test all services, and if any of the services
performed did not conform with the contract requirement, the
Government could require petitioner alternatively to (1) perform
the services again in conformity with those requirements or (2)
take necessary action to ensure the conformance of future
performance.
2. Contracting Officer and Contracting Officer’s
Representative
The personal service contracts were executed by a
contracting officer on behalf of the Government. Under the
personal service contracts, the contracting officer could
designate a contracting officer’s representative (COR) to take
action for the Contacting Officer under the contracts. The
designation had to specify the scope and limitations of the
authority delegated. Under the personal service contracts,
petitioner was directly responsible to the COR. The COR was to
provide assignments to petitioner, provide policy guidance,
establish general priorities, and outline policy goals and
objectives. Petitioner was responsible for planning and carrying
out the projects.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011