- 11 -
Program. Petitioner was not permitted to enroll in the Immediate
Benefit Plan providing death benefits to Federal employees.
During the contract periods, petitioner was not permitted to
park in the parking facility reserved for permanent, full-time
employees of the State Department. Petitioner was not eligible
for (1) “Metrocheks”, although State Department employees within
the definition of 5 U.S.C. sec. 2105 were entitled to that
benefit; (2) performance awards during the contract periods; or
(3) membership in the Federal employees union while employed
under her personal service contracts.
Petitioner did not make capital investments related to her
personal service contracts during the periods covered by the
contracts. Petitioner worked exclusively for the State
Department and had no other clients or employers.
4. Mr. Urman’s Evaluation Report
At the end of the term of the first personal service
contract, Mr. Urman submitted a Contractor’s Evaluation
Statement, dated July 1, 1999, wherein he evaluated petitioner’s
performance under the contract. Mr. Urman stated that petitioner
was responsible for providing onsite and followup service to
overseas posts to help the posts implement effective “SHEM”
programs. As part of that activity, petitioner had visited 18
posts, prepared reports, and provided followup activities to
ensure that the posts understood and implemented her
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011