- 7 -
The personal service contracts named Stephen Urman as the
COR. Under Delegations of Authority and Responsibility of
Contracting Officer’s Representative, the contracting officer
authorized Mr. Urman to: (1) Coordinate with petitioner on all
technical matters, (2) give technical clarification as to the
meaning of the specifications including inspecting, testing, and
acceptance procedures, (3) inspect petitioner’s progress to
assure compliance with the contract terms and conditions, and (4)
perform all functions necessary to accept the products or
services for the Government. The delegation precluded Mr. Urman
from altering or modifying the personal service contracts. Upon
completion of petitioner’s work, Mr. Urman was to inspect
petitioner’s work and inform the contracting officer, in writing,
of any deviations from contract requirements. If there were no
deficiencies, a statement of satisfactory (or better) performance
would be appropriate. Mr. Urman was to prepare a written
evaluation of petitioner’s performance at the end of the
contract.
Under the personal service contracts, petitioner was
required to provide the services personally and was not permitted
to reassign or delegate her duties to others. Petitioner did not
have any employees.
Petitioner worked with Federal employees and other workers.
Petitioner did not supervise direct hire Government personnel,
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011