Robert Dallas - Page 28

                                        - 28 -                                        
          They are not the result of mistake, undue influence, fraud, or              
          duress.                                                                     
               We conclude on the basis of the foregoing that the self-               
          canceling clauses must be given effect, and that the value of               
          each of the 1999 notes is $1,687,704 as determined by                       
          respondent.19  To reflect the foregoing,                                    

                                                       Decision will be               
                                                  entered under Rule 155.             




















               19  In the opening brief, respondent contended that the                
          share adjustment clauses are void because they are against public           
          policy.  Petitioner did not respond to respondent’s argument.               
          We deem this issue conceded because petitioner made no argument             
          about it on brief.  See Chevron Corp. v. Commissioner, 104 T.C.             
          719, 758 (1995); Remuzzi v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1988-8,                
          affd. without published opinion 867 F.2d 609 (4th Cir. 1989).               




Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  

Last modified: May 25, 2011