Cheryl McKnight - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          section 6015(f) only with respect to 50 percent of petitioner’s             
          and John’s $17,516 underpayment and under section 6015(c) only              
          with respect to 50 percent of petitioner and John’s $6,452                  
          deficiency, as follows, subject to any applicable limitations               
          under Rev. Proc. 2003-61, sec. 4.04(2) and sec. 6015(g)(3):                 

                Nature of        Amount of   Appeals Office Relief                    
                Liability        Liability   Amount     Basis for                     
                Underpayment      $17,516     $8,792    Sec. 6015(f)                  
                Deficiency        $6,452      $3,226    Sec. 6015(c)                  

               Respondent’s Appeals Office’s determination (to grant                  
          petitioner relief from joint liability only as to 50 percent of             
          the $17,516 underpayment and as to 50 percent of the $6,452                 
          deficiency) was based primarily on respondent’s analysis that the           
          other 50 percent of the underpayment and the other 50 percent of            
          the deficiency were attributable to what respondent regarded as             
          petitioner’s 50-percent ownership interest in MGI.                          
               With regard to the portion of the underpayment from which              
          respondent determined that petitioner should be granted relief              
          under section 6015(f), respondent’s Appeals Office determined               
          that the factors set forth in Rev. Proc. 2003-61, sec. 4.03,                
          2003-2 C.B. at 298, supported such relief.                                  
               With regard to the portion of the deficiency from which                
          respondent determined that petitioner should be granted relief              







Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011