- 19 - Section 6015(c) Relief As explained, respondent concluded that petitioner qualified generally for relief under section 6015(c). Respondent, however, concluded that only 50 percent of the $6,452 deficiency was attributable to John and therefore granted relief to petitioner from joint liability under section 6015(c) only as to 50 percent (or $3,226) of the $6,452 tax deficiency. The entire $6,452 deficiency, however, is attributable to John. John owned all of MGI beneficially, and whatever interest in MGI petitioner may have held was only as a nominee. Petitioner has established that none of the income from MGI should be attributable to her. Further, John, not petitioner, owned the Castle Rock home to which the disallowed mortgage interest deductions relate. Petitioner therefore qualifies under section 6015(c) for relief from joint liability as to the entire $6,452 deficiency.5 5 Sec. 6015(g)(3), however, provides that no credit or refund will be allowed as a result of sec. 6015(c) relief. Herein, the entire $6,452 deficiency has been paid, and therefore petitioner is not entitled to a refund of any amounts that petitioner paid on the deficiency. If, however, we were to hold that petitioner did not qualify for relief from the deficiency under sec. 6015(c), and then grant petitioner equitable relief from the deficiency under sec. 6015(f), under Rev. Proc. 2003-61, sec. 4.04(1), 2003-2 C.B. 296, 299, petitioner apparently still would be disallowed a refund of amounts petitioner has paid on the deficiency (i.e., payments petitioner made on the deficiency prior to her request for sec. 6015(f) equitable relief relating thereto would not be refundable).Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011