John R. Ray IV and Rochelle L. Ray - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
         arbitration were voluntary and did not constitute alimony for                
         Federal income tax purposes.  Subsequent to March 13, 2002, Mr.              
         Ray wrote to Ms. Bader a total of 10 checks, totaling $23,000 of             
         which he states that he intended $20,000 to be alimony and the               
         remainder to be child support.  Of the $20,000, Mr. Ray                      
         substantiated that $16,000 was alimony.  Ms. Bader agrees that she           
         received alimony of $16,000 in 2002 and has paid Federal income              
         tax on that amount.                                                          
         II. Issues Raised                                                            
              At issue in this case is whether the remaining $4,000                   
         constitutes alimony within the meaning of section 71(b)(1) that is           
         deductible by Mr. Ray under section 215(a) and that is includable            
         in the income of Ms. Bader under section 71(a).                              
              The $4,000 at issue is represented by three checks:  (1)                
         $2,000 is attributable to check No. 1095, dated March 22, 2002,              
         (2) $1,000 is attributable to check No. 1129, dated May 5, 2002,             
         and (3) $1,000 is attributable to check No. 1148, dated May 20,              
         2002.                                                                        
              Check No. 1095 was a check for $3,000.  Of that amount, Mr.             
         Ray claims that he intended $2,000 to be his initial alimony                 
         payment (Initial Payment) and the remainder to be child support.             
         Mr. Ray testified that he made the Initial Payment prior to the              
         prescribed date of April 1, 2002, because he assumed that the                
         divorce was final after the March 13 arbitration.  He also assumed           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011