John R. Ray IV and Rochelle L. Ray - Page 18

                                        - 17 -                                        
         $1,000, unless Mr. Ray could prove otherwise.  Check No. 1129                
         falls within this category.                                                  
              Subsequent to the examination, Mr. Ray obtained a copy of               
         canceled check No. 1129.  It was made payable to “Jennie Ray”, and           
         had a notation of “Alimony”.  In addition, Mr. Ray introduced a              
         copy of canceled check No. 1126, dated May 2, 2002, made payable             
         to “Harris County Child Support” in the amount of $2,000 (May                
         child support) to prove that a separate child support payment was            
         sent to the department in May of 2002.  At trial, Mr. Ray argued             
         that check Nos. 1129 and 1126, when viewed together, showed that             
         the entire $3,000 of check 1129 was alimony.                                 
              Mr. Ray contends that the May child support payment was the             
         first time that he had sent his payment through the department.              
         Mr. Ray explained that check No. 1114, the payment immediately               
         preceding check No. 1129, bore a notation of “1000-child support             
         2000-alimony”, because in April he did not know where the child              
         support payments should be sent.  Checks thereafter did not                  
         specify a child support and alimony split, because all child                 
         support payments were sent through Harris County, and all alimony            
         payments were sent directly to Ms. Bader.                                    
              Ms. Bader, on the other hand, does not remember whether the             
         checks at issue were intended as child support or alimony, but she           
         nevertheless contends that they were for child support.  Ms. Bader           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011