- 16 - proof of the existence of a contract between the parties and it must memorialize the parties’ understanding regarding the terms of alimony payments). Accordingly, the Initial Payment was not made “under” the qualifying divorce instrument because it was paid prior to April 1, 2002. Payments not received under a divorce decree or separation instrument are not deductible under section 215. Healey v. Commissioner, supra; Ali v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-284; Meyer v. Commissioner, supra; Jachym v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1984-181. Based on the foregoing, the Court concludes that the Initial Payment was voluntary because it fell outside of the scope of the qualified divorce instrument, and it is therefore not alimony within the meaning of section 71(b)(1). B. Whether Check Nos. 1129 and 1148 Were Alimony or Child Support Payments The divorce decree obligated Mr. Ray to pay child support of $2,000 per month, with the first payment due and payable on April 1, 2002. All child support payments were required to be made through the Harris County Child Support Department (department) and remitted by the department to Ms. Bader. During the examination, Mr. Ray and the examining agent assumed that any check in the amount of $3,000, dated after April 1, 2002, was intended as alimony of $2,000 and child support ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011