John S. and Christobel D. Rendall - Page 28

                                       - 28 -                                         
               delivered to the transferee belong, whether or not the                 
               taxpayer intends, or instructs his broker or other                     
               agent, to sell or transfer stock from a lot purchased                  
               or acquired on a different date or for a different                     
               price.                                                                 
                    (3) Identification on confirmation document.  (i)                 
               Where the stock is left in the custody of a broker or                  
               other agent, an adequate identification is made if --                  
                    (a) At the time of the sale or transfer, the                      
               taxpayer specifies to such broker or other agent having                
               custody of the stock the particular stock to be sold or                
               transferred, and                                                       
                    (b) Within a reasonable time thereafter,                          
               confirmation of such specification is set forth in a                   
               written document from such broker or other agent.                      
               Stock identified pursuant to this subdivision is the                   
               stock sold or transferred by the taxpayer, even though                 
               stock certificates from a different lot are delivered                  
               to the taxpayer’s transferee.                                          
               Petitioners argue that Merrill Lynch’s actions in selling              
          634,100 of the pledged shares “precluded [Mr. Rendall] from                 
          making any identification at or about the time of the sale by               
          Merrill Lynch”, and that their “first opportunity” to identify              
          the shares sold was in connection with the preparation and filing           
          of their 1997 return.  Petitioners conclude that they made                  
          adequate identification of the shares sold on Schedule D of their           
          1997 return.                                                                
               Respondent argues that “Mr. Rendall was well aware that                
          Merrill Lynch intended to sell a portion of the pledged stock to            
          satisfy his margin loan debt” and, “[d]espite knowing of Merrill            
          Lynch’s intentions * * *, petitioners made no attempt to comply             






Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011