Wechsler & Co., Inc. - Page 56

                                       - 56 -                                         
         earnings and capital stock.  Notwithstanding petitioner’s poor               
         performance for its 1999 fiscal year, Mrs. Wechsler received a               
         substantial 1999 bonus of $308,000.  The record reflects that                
         (except for Mr. Wechsler) petitioner’s other employees received              
         far lower bonuses for the 1999 fiscal year than Mrs. Wechsler                
         received.  For example, petitioner paid Matt Dickinson (its vice             
         president and a principal, who had worked for petitioner since               
         January 1989) a 1999 salary of $149,969 and a 1999 bonus of                  
         $115,768; petitioner paid Michael Revy (its vice president and a             
         principal, who had worked for petitioner since August 1998) a                
         1999 salary of $208,000 and a 1999 bonus of $188,000; it paid Mr.            
         Mittentag (its chief financial officer) a 1999 salary of $179,385            
         and a 1999 bonus of $43,461.                                                 
              Mr. Wechsler set the amounts of petitioner’s 1999 payments              
         to Mrs. Wechsler.  According to Mr. Wechsler, Mrs. Wechsler                  
         agreed to work for petitioner only if she were paid at least                 
         about $500,000 annually.  That $500,000 minimum annual pay to                
         her, however, is substantially higher than the 1999 annual                   
         salaries of the aforementioned officers who were unrelated to Mr.            
         Wechsler and is also significantly higher than Mr. Wechsler’s                
         1992 through 1998 annual salaries.13  We are unpersuaded that                

               13  On brief, petitioner argues that Mrs. Wechsler’s                   
          compensation and Gilbert’s compensation were reasonable when                
          compared to the compensation paid certain other employees of                
          petitioner, such as Mr. Lobel, who was paid $434,000 for fiscal             
          year 1998.  Petitioner notes that respondent did not challenge              
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011