Charles A. and Marian L. Derby, et al. - Page 50




                                        - 50 -                                        
          the first instance, employment that was compensated with shares of          
          revenue (47 to 57.75 percent) that significantly exceeded the               
          median share of revenue (45.18 percent) devoted to physician                
          compensation in petitioners' specialties; a $35,000 "Physician              
          Access Bonus" for each SWMG physician, including petitioners;31 an          
          absence of restrictions on establishing a competing medical                 
          practice in the event of cessation of employment with SMF; and              
          greater economic security in the managed care environment.  Other           

               31 Petitioners strenuously argue that the "Physician Access            
          Bonuses" were consideration for the SWMG physicians' agreement to           
          maintain "open" practices; i.e., to accept new patients                     
          notwithstanding existing patient loads.  Accordingly, petitioners           
          contend, the "Physician Access Bonuses" could not have served as            
          consideration for the SWMG physicians' transfer of their medical            
          practice intangibles.                                                       
               Petitioners' argument is unpersuasive.  As with petitioners'           
          broader claim that no consideration was paid for their intangible           
          assets, the argument depends upon segregating elements of                   
          consideration that were part of an integrated, and intensely                
          negotiated, agreement.  The extensive and otherwise detailed                
          written agreements governing the transaction with SMF do not                
          mention any open practice requirement.  Even if the transaction             
          documents had expressly allocated the $35,000 bonuses to the                
          physicians' agreements to maintain open practices, we would                 
          remain unpersuaded, because there is no evidence in the record              
          that a $35,000 payment was customary for a physician-employee's             
          agreement to maintain an open practice.  In fact, one SMF                   
          official who testified conceded that no such bonuses had been               
          paid to other physician groups that affiliated with SMF, and the            
          Dutcher appraisal does not address the bonuses.  Tellingly, when            
          the PSA was renegotiated to cover the period after its initial 2-           
          year term, there was no comparable provision for "Physician                 
          Access Bonuses" to secure the SWMG physicians' open practice                
          commitments.  After respondent noted this apparent inconsistency            
          on brief, petitioners offered no explanation to account for it.             
          Consequently, we find that the $35,000 "Physician Access Bonuses"           
          are not fully allocable to open practice agreements and instead             
          were part of the consideration package received by the SWMG                 
          physicians in exchange for the transfer of their medical                    
          practices.                                                                  





Page:  Previous  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008