Charles A. and Marian L. Derby, et al. - Page 59




                                        - 59 -                                        
          organization's tax-exempt status.  Since in the foregoing                   
          materials the Commissioner specifically contemplated a charitable           
          contribution under section 170 and did not put it into issue or             
          otherwise treat the matter as problematic, petitioners argue that           
          the Commissioner has thereby indicated that donative intent in              
          such transactions is presumed or is not a significant issue.                
          Thus, petitioners conclude, by challenging petitioners' donative            
          intent in a virtually identical transaction, respondent has                 
          violated his duty of consistency between his rulings and                    
          litigation position, contrary to our holding in Rauenhorst v.               
          Commissioner, 119 T.C. 157 (2002).                                          
               Respondent argues that:  (1) The transaction considered in             
          the Friendly Hills determination letter is materially                       
          distinguishable from the transaction in this case, (2) neither              
          that letter nor the instruction manuals address the section 170             
          deduction issue, and (3) in any event, neither may be cited as              
          precedent.  Therefore, respondent considers Rauenhorst to be                
          inapposite.                                                                 
               We agree with respondent that, under Rauenhorst, neither the           
          Friendly Hills determination letter nor the instruction manuals             
          limit the position respondent may take in these cases.                      
               The Friendly Hills determination letter did concern the                
          acquisition of the assets (including "intangible assets") of a              
          physicians' medical group by a nonprofit medical foundation in              







Page:  Previous  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008