- 59 - organization's tax-exempt status. Since in the foregoing materials the Commissioner specifically contemplated a charitable contribution under section 170 and did not put it into issue or otherwise treat the matter as problematic, petitioners argue that the Commissioner has thereby indicated that donative intent in such transactions is presumed or is not a significant issue. Thus, petitioners conclude, by challenging petitioners' donative intent in a virtually identical transaction, respondent has violated his duty of consistency between his rulings and litigation position, contrary to our holding in Rauenhorst v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 157 (2002). Respondent argues that: (1) The transaction considered in the Friendly Hills determination letter is materially distinguishable from the transaction in this case, (2) neither that letter nor the instruction manuals address the section 170 deduction issue, and (3) in any event, neither may be cited as precedent. Therefore, respondent considers Rauenhorst to be inapposite. We agree with respondent that, under Rauenhorst, neither the Friendly Hills determination letter nor the instruction manuals limit the position respondent may take in these cases. The Friendly Hills determination letter did concern the acquisition of the assets (including "intangible assets") of a physicians' medical group by a nonprofit medical foundation inPage: Previous 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008