- 61 - Most importantly, the Friendly Hills determination letter, as petitioners concede on brief, pursuant to section 6110(j)(3)38 "may not be used or cited as precedent." Similarly, although the instruction manuals generally describe methods by which an integrated delivery system may be formed, including acquisition of medical group assets "by donation, fair market value purchase, lease, license, stock transfer or a combination thereof" (emphasis added), those publications also focus on mergers of nonprofit hospitals or medical foundations with physician groups from the standpoint of the former entities' qualification for tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3). Similar to the Friendly Hills determination letter, the instruction manuals do not specifically address the charitable contribution issue, which accounts for their failure to emphasize the requirement of donative intent in connection with any "donation" of assets by the physicians. Moreover, the introduction to each annual edition of the instruction manuals contains the following statement: "The text is for educational purposes only. It is not authority, and may not be cited as such." 37(...continued) basis of the Houlihan appraisal used by petitioners for purposes of filing their 1994 returns (but now abandoned by them), the claimed donations would constitute approximately 41 percent of the value of SWMG ($1,632,377 intangibles/$4 million business enterprise value). 38 Currently codified as sec. 6110(k)(3).Page: Previous 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008