Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC, 528 U.S. 377, 54 (2000)

Page:   Index   Previous  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54

430

NIXON v. SHRINK MISSOURI GOVERNMENT PAC

Thomas, J., dissenting

The same principles apply here, and dictate a result contrary to the one the majority reaches. States are free to enact laws that directly punish those engaged in corruption and require the disclosure of large contributions, but they are not free to enact generalized laws that suppress a tremendous amount of protected speech along with the targeted corruption.

V

Because the Court unjustifiably discounts the First Amendment interests of citizens and candidates, and consequently fails to strictly scrutinize the inhibition of political speech and competition, I respectfully dissent.

Page:   Index   Previous  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54

Last modified: October 4, 2007