THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SHINICHI SATOH, HIROJI OZAKI and
TAKAHISA EIMORI
__________
Appeal No. 95-2599
Application 07/983,9311
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
1Application for patent filed December 1, 1992. This
application is a continuation of Application 07/787,912 now U.S.
Patent 5,543,646 issued August 6, 1996, which is a continuation
of Application 07/242,116, now U.S. Patent No. 5,089,863, issued
February 18, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007