Ex parte SATOH et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-2599                                                          
          Application 07/983,931                                                      


          claims 6, 8 through 10, 22, 24 and 25.  Claims 1 through 5, 7, 11           
          through 21 and 23 have been canceled.                                       
               The invention relates generally to a field effect                      
          transistor.  Appellants disclose on pages 3 and 4 of the                    
          specification that N+ impurities are diffused in a transverse               
          direction producing an overlapping portion in a distance )L under           
          gate electrode 3 as shown in Figure 1C.  This overlapping portion           
          constitutes an additional capacitance between the gate and the              
          source-drain preventing the transistor from operating at a high             
          speed as well as increasing the power consumption of the                    
          transistor.                                                                 
               On page 9 of the specification, Appellants disclose that               
          they solved this problem by forming a field effect transistor               
          with a T-shaped gate electrode 3 having a lower layer 3a and an             
          upper layer 3b as shown in Figure 4A.  On page 12 of the                    
          specification, Appellants disclose that the lower layer 3a and              
          the upper layer 3b are etched by a known plasma etching method as           
          shown in Figure 5C.  The lower layer 3a and the upper layer 3b              
          are formed of the same base composition, i.e. polysilicon.                  
          However, Appellants disclose that these layers contain a                    
          differing chemical or physical feature which provides the lower             
          layer 3a with a faster etch rate as compared with the upper layer           

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007