THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte THOMAS J. POLLOCK
and LINDA THORNE
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0448
Application 07/825,6321
______________
HEARD: April 11, 1997
_______________
Before SCHAFER, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and
GRON and WEIMAR, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIMAR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed January 24, 1992. Accord-
ing to applicants, the application is a division of Applica-
tion 07/517,551, filed April 24, 1990, which is a continuation
of Application 07/180,945, filed April 12, 1988, now aban-
doned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/038,302, filed April 14, 1987, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007