Appeal No. 95-1351 Application 07/547,630 For the reasons stated above, the rejection of independent claims 1 and 8 is reversed. Since dependent claims 2-4, 6, 9-11, 13, and 15-20 incorporate the limitation of claims 1 and 8, the rejection of these claims is also reversed. REVERSED GARY V. HARKCOM ) Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) LEE E. BARRETT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) - 8 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007