Appeal No. 95-4493 Application 07/756,646 though unintended or incidental consequence of what was deliberately intended . It is clear that any production of6 alpha-1 by Carter was unintended or incidental to the deliberate production of alpha and beta. For the foregoing reasons, the rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Carter is reversed. REVERSED SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ANDREW H. METZ ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) THOMAS WALTZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) 6Chisum on Patents, Vol. 1, § 3.03[2], p. 3-37 (Matthew Bender, 1997). 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007