THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte V. DURGA NAGESWAR RAO, DANIEL MICHAEL KABAT
and
HARRY ARTHUR CIKANEK
____________
Appeal No. 96-3202
Application No. 08/183,4641
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
MEISTER and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 20, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed January 19, 1994.
According to the appellants, the application is a
continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/795,320, filed
November 12, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007