Appeal No. 96-3202
Application No. 08/183,464
Claims 1 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, as the specification fails to adequately
teach how to make the invention.
Claims 1 through 6, 9, 14 through 17, 19 and 20 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Oda,
Shiraya, Rao and Tanaka.
Claims 7 and 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Oda, Shiraya, Rao, Tanaka and Purnell.
Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Oda, Shiraya, Rao, Tanaka and Behnke.
Claims 10 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Oda, Shiraya, Rao, Tanaka and Buente.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007