THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LILLIAN P. STURM and KURT D. SALOMON
____________
Appeal No. 97-3187
Application No. 07/999,4221
____________
HEARD: September 16, 1997
____________
Before CALVERT, COHEN, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's final rejection
(Paper No. 18, mailed November 13, 1995) of claims 1 through 6
1Application for reissue patent filed December 31, 1992.
According to the appellants, the application is a reissue of
U.S. Patent No. 4,981,095 (Application No. 07/470,974, filed
January 26, 1990), which was a continuation of Application No.
07/321,720, filed March 10, 1989, now U.S. Patent No.
4,901,661.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007