THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 49
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte BRUCE E. GRAY
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0005
Application 08/141,4121
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, FLEMING and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the final rejection of claims 44-50. All other claims have
been canceled. No claim has been allowed.
1 Application for patent filed October 22, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of application 07/996,515,
filed December 16, 1992, which is a continuation of application 07/691,680,
filed April 25, 1991, which is a continuation of application 07/627,544, filed
December 10, 1990, which is a continuation of application 07/262,799, filed
October 26, 1988, which is a continuation of application 06/848,287, filed
April 4, 1986 (now U.S. patent no. 4,782,341), which is a continuation of
application 06/510,753, filed July 1, 1983 (now U.S. patent no. 4,652,877).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007