Ex parte GRAY - Page 2




            Appeal No. 95-0005                                                                           
            Application 08/141,412                                                                       



                              References relied on by the Examiner                                       
                  Tolson                   3,337,992                      Aug. 29, 1967                  
                  White                    4,132,981                      Jan. 02, 1979                  
                  Lapsley            (UK) 1,253,826                       Nov. 17, 1971                  
                  (United Kingdom)                                                                       
                                      The Rejection on Appeal                                            
                  Claims 44-50 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                              
            as being unpatentable over Lapsley, Tolson, and White.                                       
                                            The Invention                                                
                  The invention is directed to a method and apparatus for                                
            determining the quantity of utility consumed during a given                                  
            time period by a customer.  Claims 44, 47 and 50 are the only                                
            independent claims, of which claim 44 is drawn to a method and                               
            claims 47 and 50 are drawn to an apparatus.  All of the claims                               
            specifically require a single inductive coupling for bidirec-                                
            tional communication of signals and data between an                                          
            interrogator and a meter transponder.  While method claim 44                                 
            does not recite the words "single inductive coupling," it                                    
            explicitly recites a primary winding and a secondary winding,                                
            and according to claim 44, the signal from the interrogator to                               
            the transponder is induced from the primary winding to the                                   
                                                   2                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007