THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte RONALD M. CASTONGUAY, and GARY B. CROCKETT _____________ Appeal No. 95-2004 Application 07/597,3701 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, KRASS and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges. LEE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 6 and 13-15. Claims 1-5 and 7-12 have been canceled. No claim has been allowed. References relied on by the Examiner Fields et al. (Fields) 5,111,391 May 1992 Application for patent filed October 12, 1990.1 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007