THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte THOMAS CACECI,
THOMAS E. TOTH
and MARIA B.W. SZUMANSKI
_____________
Appeal No. 95-2041
Application 07/814,2201
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, GRON and WEIMAR, Administrative
Patent Judges.
WEIMAR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed December 23, 1991. Accord-1
ing to applicants, the application is a continuation of Appli-
cation 07/588,437, filed September 25, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007