Appeal No. 95-2041
Application 07/814,220
Willson et al., "A Simple Method For Constructing Directly
Repeated Multimeric DNA Segments," Gene Anal. Techn., Vol. 2,
pages 77-82 (1985).
The rejection of claims 17, 18, 48 and 49 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph, presented in the Examiner's Answer,
mailed December 6, 1993, has been obviated, as indicated in
the Supplemental Examiner's Answer, mailed February 9, 1994.
Claims 6, 11 and 32-39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
112, first paragraph, as being based on a disclosure which
fails to provide a written description which would have en-
abled any person skilled in the art to which it pertains to
practice the claimed invention throughout the full scope of
the claims without undue experimentation.
Claims 6, 11, 17-21 and 32-47 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 over a combination of all of the above listed
references.
We vacate the examiner's rejections with respect to
claims 6, 11, 21 and 32-47, make new grounds of rejection with
respect to these claims under the provisions of 37 CFR §
1.196(b); and reverse the examiner's rejection with respect to
claims 17-20.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007