THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RUBY BEI-LOH LEE and JOHN P. BECK
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3497
Application 08/158,6491
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's
final rejection of claims 3, 5-14, and 16-20 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103. Claims 4 and 15 stand rejected for depending from2
1Application for patent filed November 29, 1993.
2A copy of claim 5, which was omitted from the appendix to
Appellants' brief, appears at page 6 of the Answer.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007