Appeal No. 95-3912
Application 08/087,247
and pieces of the respective circuit elements from the
respective references relied upon. In any event, we are not
convinced the examiner has established a prima facie case of
obviousness of the subject matter of independent claims 1, 7,
14 and 20 on the basis of Fisk and Federico. As such, we also
reverse the rejection of additional dependent claims further
relying upon the teachings of Daughton.
Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims
1 to 23 on appeal is reversed.
REVERSED
)
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007