The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte EDDY VOS _____________ Appeal No. 95-4089 Application 08/090,0731 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before: WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge, and FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and RICHARD E. SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge. Application for patent filed July 19, 1993. Applicant claims the benefit of the1 filing date of PCT/US92/00250, filed January 21, 1992 and European Patent Application 91-870011.3, filed January 22, 1991. The real party in interest appears to be The Procter & Gamble Co.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007