THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 57
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
SHMUEL CABILLY, HERBERT L. HEYNEKER,
WILLIAM E. HOLMES, ARTHUR D. RIGGS
and RONALD B. WETZEL
Junior party1
v.
MICHAEL A. BOSS, JOHN H. KENTEN,
JOHN S. EMTAGE and CLIVE R. WOOD
Senior party2
__________
Patent Interference No. 102,572
___________
1Application 08/205,419, filed June 10, 1988. According benefit of Application
06/483,457, filed April 8, 1983, now patent No. 4,816,567, issued March 28, 1989.
Assignee for Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, A California Corporation.
2Application 06/672,265, filed November 14, 1984, now Patent No. 4,816,397,
issued March 28, 1989. Accorded benefit of PCT application, PCT/GB84/00094, filed
March 23, 1984 and UK application No. 83/08235, filed March 25, 1983. Assignee for
Celltech Limited, Berkshire SL1 4DY, U.K., A British Company.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007