Ex parte HOULIHAN - Page 18




          Appeal No. 1995-1539                                                        
          Application No. 07/950,388                                                  


          (3) The § 102 rejection of claims 1 an 4 over Kvakovszky is                 
          sustained;                                                                  
          (4) The § 103 rejection of claim 5 over the combined                        
          disclosures of Nader, Kvakovszky, Pine and the admitted prior               
          art is sustained; and                                                       
          (5) The § 103 rejection of claims 1, 2, 4 and 5 over the                    
          combined disclosures of Pine and the admitted prior art is not              
          sustained.                                                                  























                                         18                                           





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007