THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No.
33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID NIN-KOU WANG,
JOHN M. WHITE, KAM S. LAW, CISSY LEUNG,
SALVADOR P. UMOTOY, KENNETH S. COLLINS,
JOHN A. ADAMIK, ILYA PERLOV, and DAN MAYDAN
____________
Appeal No. 95-2347
Application No. 07/928,6421
____________
HEARD: Mar. 8, 1999
____________
Before PAK, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed August 13, 1992. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/537,445, filed June, 13, 1990; which is a
continuation of Application 06/944,492, filed December 19,
1986, now Patent No. 5,000,113.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007