Ex parte BOIME - Page 1





                        THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                  
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today             
               (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and               
               (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                                                       Paper No. 27                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                                Ex parte IRVING BOIME                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 95-2613                                   
                               Application 07/876,7941                                
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge, and                   
          FRED E. MCKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and                   
          ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
          ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 4 and 7 through 10, all the                   
          claims remaining in the application.                                        
               Claims 1 through 3 and 7 through 9 are illustrative of                 


               1Application for patent filed April 30, 1992.                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007