Appeal No. 95-2613 Application 07/876,794 limited to the use of GH cells, these, and the closely- 3 related GH cells, were the only type of regulated secretory 4 granule-containing animal cell considered by the examiner. That is, the prior art relied on by the examiner for the teaching of host cells within the scope of the broad claim, Hellerman and Clayton, are directed to the use of GH and GH4 3 cells, respectively. In addition, we direct attention to p. 7, second complete para. of the Answer wherein the examiner states that the Examiner notes that the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 was drawn specifically to the obviousness of GH and other anterior 3 pituitary cells, and there has been no prosecution to date on the basis of other cell lines which may contain secretory granules- the obvious species (GH cells) 3 also renders the genus (cells having secretory granules) obvious. Discussion The examiner has predicated her conclusion of obviousness on the collective teachings of Boime, Hellerman or Clayton, and Vander. Boime describes the construction of expression vectors comprising the DNA sequences encoding the " subunit common to FSH, LH, CG and TSH and/or the $ subunit of FSH, LH 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007