Appeal No. 95-2710 Application 08/011,837 of an antibody which can agglutinate sexually transmitted disease pathogens and sperm (answer, pages 4, 7 and 8). Appellants argue that their specification discloses five antibodies which are useful for carrying out the claimed methods and provides six criteria for screening additional pan semen antibodies (brief, pages 7-10). The specification, appellants argue (brief, page 9), discloses at page 16, lines 26-33, antibodies which immobilize sperm and also immobilize virtually all other cells in semen by coagulating them with the sperm (see also, reply brief, pages 4-5). With respect to enablement, a predecessor of our appellate reviewing court stated in In re Marzocchi, 439 F.2d 220, 223-24, 169 USPQ 367, 369-70 (CCPA 1971): [A] specification disclosure which contains a teaching of the manner and process of making and using the invention in terms which correspond in scope to those used in describing and defining the subject matter sought to be patented must be taken as in compliance with the enabling requirement of the first paragraph of § 112 unless there is reason to doubt the objective truth of the statements contained therein which must be relied on for enabling support. . . . . . . . . . . it is incumbent upon the Patent Office, -7-7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007