THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KAZUFUMI YOKOGAWA,TAKAHIKO FUJISAKI,
MIYAO TAKAHASHI,SHIGERU KAWABATA, NAOKI HARADA,
KINGO AKAHORI, YUTAKA KAYANE, and TAKASHI OMURA
__________
Appeal No. 95-2830
Application 07/967,6171
__________
HEARD: Feb. 11, 1999
__________
Before WARREN, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 5 through 9, 11 and
12, all of the claims remaining in this application.
1Application for patent filed October 29, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007