Appeal No. 95-2830
Application No. 07/967,617
illustrative and a copy of which taken from the appellants'
Brief is appended to this decision.
The examiner has relied upon the following references to
support the rejections:
Pedrazzi 5,122,605 Jun. 16, 1992
Yokogawa et al. 5,478,936 Dec. 26, 1995
(Yokogawa) (filed Aug. 7, 1991)
Sumimoto Chem Co. 0 472 975 Mar. 4, 1992
(EP '975)
THE REJECTIONS
The examiner's Final Rejection dated February 25, 1994 is
directed to five separate and distinct rejections of record.
The first two are directed to the rejection of claims 11 and
12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Yokogawa(CA
118:8311C) in view of EP '975, Pedrazzi or Smith and the2
rejection of claims 1, 5 through 9, 11 and 12 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as unpatentable over Ridyard in view of EP '975,
Pedrazzi or Smith. Neither of these rejections has been
maintained by the examiner in the Examiner's Answer.
2This Yokogawa reference as opposed to the Yokogawa
patent (5,478,936) is a Chemical Abstracts citation, 118:8311C
04/08/92. The Chemical Abstracts reference is no longer relied
upon by the examiner in the Examiner's Answer.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007